Criticism, the First Step to Improve
Criticism, the First Step to Improve
Article from reader yingooee@163.com
With the socialist modernization, evaluation system has been introduced to nearly all walks of life. With the points mentioned above, students’ appraisal for teachers can be both beneficial to either part for its progressive outcomes. No matter in which form the reflection is carried out, it will inevitably indicate what the students need, whether their teachers are qualified to meet all those needs and whether the way of teaching can be acceptable and easily enough to access students as long as students taking part in are in large number. Evaluating and criticizing is different from complaining which means continuously expressing the unsatisfactory facets that occur in education. Regular evaluations, say, once in a term, show what teachers need to improve, which help to push them to be on the way to a better teacher-student interactive relationship. Therefore in order to make an overall appraisal of the process of teaching and learning, it is necessary to count these direct effect receivers in. Students are the direct receiver of education process. Secondly, evaluation and criticism constitute the core portion of education. The following advantages of this practice can give a clear “yes” to the question. First and foremost, students’ evaluation and criticism, to a certain extent, can reflect how the education process is going on. by yingooee@163.com However, abuse of the evaluation system is still looming large. Occurrence of loss of respect and discipline in the classroom is calling for much attention. Teacher-appraisals can not only bring good to the teachers, but also be beneficial to students in return. On the other hand, much more satisfied with the adjustments teachers made, students will be more likely to be fully devoted in study. It calls for critical thinking to differentiate facets coming from teachers that can be changed from those of themselves and those cannot be improved; it requires students to think a second thought before clicking, writing or speaking, which can neither be well practiced in the class environment. Then here comes the question whether this evaluating method can really create the anticipated effects to optimize teachers and finally optimize the education process. On line appraisal, traditional written form, face to face interview and all other modus operandi have gained their access to students to help evaluating teachers. So it does happen to the education field. What is working and exercising during the process is the elemental method for progress teachers of generations have been striving to instill in students’ minds. It means more than just expressing. All in all, human can never be perfect and to evaluate is the first step to improve. To avoid this, a comprehensive regulation system and before-hand instructions should be applied.
No tags for this post.